������ϲʹ�������

As global demand for wood is forecast to increase by up to 170% by 2050, a new study published in demonstrates the importance of achieving net zero targets through the better use of waste wood, and proposes solutions for how this could be achieved.

Wood harvested from managed forests is increasingly recognised as an important source of renewable biomaterial. It can deliver major benefits for reducing global warming, including capturing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere as trees grow, storing that carbon in products manufactured from the harvested wood, and reducing emissions when these products are used in place of materials like concrete and steel.

A team of researchers from ������ϲʹ�������, the University of Galway in Ireland and Woodknowledge Wales, using a rigorous analysis of the whole life cycle of this system, found that potential benefits for net zero are not being maximised with the current way that wood products are used in UK.

Whilst less than 1% of waste wood goes to landfill in UK, far too many wood products are simply burnt after their first use as biomass for generating electricity or heat, when instead they could be re-used or recycled into new products that continue to store their carbon. The inefficiency of the present system also means that trees are harvested at a much greater rate than is necessary to provide new wood for manufacturing. This really matters for the UK as our imports of wood products in 2022 cost £11.5 billion.

The evidence produced by this research shows that improving the use of waste wood products would deliver a rapid and sustained reduction of 78% in carbon emissions by 2050 compared with the current, mainly single-use approach. This immediate decarbonisation benefit results from the reduction in demand for newly harvested timber and compliments the slower, more long-term benefits of planting new forests for wood production. Combining all of these approaches would achieve a reduction in emissions equivalent to 258.8 million tonnes of carbon dioxide, cumulatively by 2050 (which equals 61% of the total of net territorial emissions of the UK in the single year of 2021).

Drawing on interviews with industry leaders, the study also explores how it would be possible to deliver a more circular model for wood use in reality. It indicates that:

• the industry needs to collaborate in new ways to provide the necessary cross-sector coordination;
• proposals for government policy interventions such as compulsory deconstruction plans for buildings are required, and;
• manufacturers need to extend responsibility for how their products are used (and reused) to maximise the benefits for slowing global warming.

Eilidh Forster, a PhD researcher at ������ϲʹ������� and lead author of the study commented “The UK is currently able to produce only a fraction of the wood it requires, yet recovered wood ‘waste’ is an under-valued resource. Improved transparency, reporting and management of recovered wood could create a multitude of circular business opportunities”.
��

David Styles, Associate Professor in Agri-sustainability at the University of Galway and co-author of the study explained that “to substantially increase the efficiency of the whole system will require some significant changes in the wood using industries in UK, backed-up by better-targeted government policies, to substantially improve their co-ordination from afforestation to better wood recovery and reuse.”

��

��